Jeet Narayan Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26587 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-475 Year-2021 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== JEET NARAYAN SAHNI Son of Late Lagan Sahni Resident of Village - Akhtiyarpur, P.s.- Karja, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Raju Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP For the informant :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 365 and 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons including the petitioner abducted the daughter and grand-daughter of the informant with an intention to kill them. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is none

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26587 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 else, but Bhainsur of the victim. It is further submitted that the victim had sold the land in excess to her share, for which the petitioner had got a title suit i.e. Partition Title Suit No.46 of 2021 instituted before the court below and in retaliation the victim has got the present case instituted against the petitioner. It is nothing, but property dispute between the petitioner and the victim. For the said reason, the present case has been instituted.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 4th, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Saraiya P.S. case No.475/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T