Ram Sagar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26397 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2024 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== Ram Sagar Yadav S/O Late Kashee Yadav R/O Village- Chintamanchak, P.SPandarak, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State, learned counsel for the informant and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 231 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 103, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons shot informant's husband due to which he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26397 of 2025(3) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no specific allegation of firing is levelled against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is an aged person. It is further submitted that specific allegation of firing is against co-accused, Rajesh Yadav. The petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 231 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T