Patna High CourtMJC/1280/2010disposed

M/S Kamla Nutrition Processing v. The Bihar State Electricity Bo

2016-08-26Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1280 of 2010 ====================================================== M/S Kamla Nutrition Processing Private Limited,Sharifaganj,Katra,Patna City, Patna, through its Director Ram Vinod Prasad, S/O Shri Ravindra Prasad, R/O Sharifaganj, P.S. Malsalami, P.O. Madhav Mills, Patna City, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The Bihar State Electricity Board,Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Through Its Chairman, Shri R. K. Sharma.

2. Shri C. L. Prakash, General Manager Cum Chief Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Undertaking, Mangles Road, Patna.

3. Shri J.P.N. Singh, Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Patna Electric Supply Undertaking (East), Shivalaya Market, Ashok Rajpath, Patna.

4. Shri Vijay Kumar, Electrical Executive Engineer, Mrt, Patna, Patna Electric Supply Undertaking (East), Shivalaya Market, Ashok Rajpath,Patna.

5. Shri Dadan Singh, Assistant Electrical Engineer, Katra, Patna City, Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Samdarshi, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Vinay Kiri Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-08-2016 By the writ order, on payment of Rs.5 lakhs against the disputed bill, the electric supply of the petitioner was directed to be restored, subject to the final assessment order that was to be passed in terms of Section-126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which

Patna High Court MJC No.1280 of 2010 (02) dt.26-08-2016 2/2 in turn subject to Section-154 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The order not having been passed, this application was filed. A show cause has been filed indicating that final assessment order has been passed. In view of that it would be open to the petitioner to take such remedial action as he may be entitled in law against the final assessment order but the same having been passed nothing remains to pursue in this application. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Trivedi/- U