Deepak Kumar Nat @ Tuntun Nat v. State Of Bihar And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.299 of 2010 ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Nat @ Tuntun Nat, Son of Shanti Devi, R/O Village Dhangain, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt.- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate Rohtas At Sasaram.

3. The Additional Collector Rohtas At Sasaram.

4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Bikramganj, District Rohtas.

5. The Anchal Adhikari, Bikramganj, District Rohtas.

6. Saroj Kumari, D/o Chand Tara Devi, Resident of Village Dhangain, P.S. Bikramganj, District Rohtas.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. M.K. Mishra, G.P.21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 09-03-2016 Restoration application is dismissed looking at the history of the litigation and keeping in mind that due to similar kind of omission, writ application was dismissed earlier as well for non-prosecution. However, if the Court gave benefit of doubt, the same has had no sobering effect.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) Sanjay/- U