Ruby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14729 of 2011 ====================================================== Ruby Kumari W/O Shri Rajesh Kumar R/O Vill.- Tappo Hat, P.S.- Dighal Bank, Distt.-Kishanganj, At Present Panchayat Teacher In Girls Primary School- Tappo Hat, Gram Panchayat Raj Mangura, P.S.- Dighal Bank, Distt.- Kishanganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj

4. The District Education Officer, Kishanganj

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Kishanganj Null Null

6. The Block Education Officer, Dighal Bank, Distt.- Kishanganj

7. The Member, District Teacher'S Employment Appellate Authority Kishanganj

8. The Mukhiya Of Gram Panchayat Raj Mangura, P.S.- Dighal Bank, Distt.- Kishanganj

9. The Panchayat Secretary Of Gram Panchayat Raj, Mangura P.S.- Dighal Bank, Distt.- Kishanganj

10. July Praveen W/O Md. Naushad Alam R/O Vill.-Khan Mangura, P.S.- Dighal Bank, Distt.- Kishanganj .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sagar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Neeraj Nandan Gp20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application with a liberty to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority challenging the order as contained in Memo No. 716 dated 28.07.2011 passed by the Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Kishanganj, which is under challenge, in this writ application.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14729 of 2011 (3) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 Permission is accorded.

The petitioner shall file an appeal within a period of thirty days from the date of the order and the same shall be disposed of within the statutory period, in accordance with law. It has further been pointed out that the petitioner was granted interim stay vide order dated 13.09.2011. The petitioner will be at liberty to file separate application for grant of any interim relief, if so advised, before the State Appellate Authority. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present application stands disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U