Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54025/2017rejected

Bablu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-13Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54025 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -SALIMPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Bablu Paswan Son of Shri Gaya Paswan resident of Village- Bahadurpur, Police Station- Salimpur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Shraddhanand Paswan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017, registered under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 448, 452, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the A.C.J.M., Barh (Patna). The accusation is that in the night of 4/5-05-2017 at about 11.30 P.M., petitioner Bablu Paswan entered in the house of informant Md. Haiyat by jumping the boundary-wall and tried to outrage the modesty of his wife. When his wife made alarm, then informant came to his room and scuffle took place between petitioner and informant and lastly petitioner succeeded to flee away. On 05.05.2017, when he went at the house of the petitioner making compliant to his guardian then seeing the villagers,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54025 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2 petitioner started to flee away and he also damaged the glass of the school bus, which was stand there.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, due to dirty village politics the petitioner has been implicated in this case.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trail Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T