M/S City Makers Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7037 of 2024 ====================================================== M/s City Makers Pvt. Ltd. A private limited company having its registered office at Ground Floor, Vasudeo City, Opposite Raj Hans Guest House, Beni Babu Ka Bagicha, Rajendra Path, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna - 800001, Bihar, through its Director namely Sri Ranjan Kumar Mertiya, Male, aged about 45 years, S/o Mr. Kailash Chand, resident of 4th Floor, Vasudeo City, Opposite Raj Hans Guest House, Beni Babu Ka Bagicha, Rajendra Path, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna-800001, Bihar,. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Pant Bhawan, Bihar, Patna.The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Bihar, Patna. 4.

Mr. Vijay Bihari Agrawal, S/o Late Banke Bihari Agrawal, R/o 58, Mithapur, Verma Sel Gali, Near Gaya Gumti No.1, P.S.- Jakkanpur, P.O.- GPO, Patna-800001.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Apurv Harsh, Advocate Mr. Manu Tripurari, Advocate Mr. Raghu Raj Pratap, Advocate Ms. Aditi Sahay, Advocate Ms. Jaya Singh, Advocate Mr. Pranshu Prakash, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Government Pleader 16 For the Resp. No. 3 :

Mr. Jainandra Kumar, Advocate For the Resp. No. 4 :

Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate Ms. Kriti Suman, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.C. to G.P.-16 for the State, learned counsel for the private respondent and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (respondent no. 3).

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7037 of 2024(5) dt.30-06-2025 2/2 petitioner, at the outset, submits that two Miscellaneous Appeals have been filed against the order impugned passed by the learned Real Estate Appellate Tribunal and thus seeks permission to withdraw the writ application for pursuing the Miscellaneous Appeals filed before this Court.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Neha/- U