← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25084/2025rejected

Ramekval Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-07Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25084 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2019 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramekval Mishra S/O Late Rambilash Mishra R/O Vill.- Gangaur, P.S.- Harlakhi, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madan Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection Saharghat P.S. Case No. 78 of 2019, F.I.R. dated 27.06.2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. According to prosecution case, there is recovery of 27 litres of Nepali illicit liquor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25084 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 F.I.R. Although, the petitioner sold the motorcycle in qeustion but it appears from the Annexure-2 Series that that petitioner has annexed the forged papers one is of 2015 and the second is of 2019.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R and the material available on record, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 78 of 2019 pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Excise Act, Madhubani.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U T