Gogan Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18107 of 2015 ====================================================== Gogan Sah son of Late Darshan Sahn Resident of village- Dhobghat, P.S. Khaira, District- Jamui, the retired orderly Peon, Middle School, Dhobghat, Anchal- Gidhaur, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Education Officer, Jamui, District- Jamui 4.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Jamui, District- Jamui 5.

The Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Girls Middle School, Gidhaur, District- Jamui ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar No. 2- SC17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2024

1. No one appears on behalf of petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief/s:- "1) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to grant the benefit of third Assured Career Progression with effect from 01.01.2009 to the petitioner in view of the Modified Assured Career Progression Rules, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as MACP Rules, 2010) on the ground that the petitioner had already completed 30 years of service on 01.01.2009.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18107 of 2015(3) dt.16-02-2024 2/2 II) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to revise the salary and pensionary benefits of the petitioner accordingly and pay it with interest at the penal rate as the petitioner has been victimized for his genuine grievance since long.

III) For issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs,order /orders, direction/directions for which the writ petitioner is found entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. No one appeared for the petitioner on 13.2.2024 also.

4. The case is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U