← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53319/2015dfd for non appearance

Rabindra Nath Pathak And ORS v. The Superintendent Of Police, Central Bureau Of Investigation, A.C.B., Dr. S.K. Singh Path, Bailey

2023-12-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53319 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2012 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Rabindra Nath Pathak and Ors son of late Jaganath Pathak Resident of Village- Chotki Sarimpur ,P.s BuxarM , District Buxar. 2.

Bir Bahadur Singh@Vir Bahadur Singh S/o late Mukteshwar Singh Residnet of Village- Maninar ,Police Station Maniar, District BaliaU.P 3.

Moti Lal Ram son of Ram Lal Ram Resident of Village-Berath, Police Station- Chaubari,District Bhojpur.

4.

Jag Narayan Singh son of late Buchul Singh Resident of Village- Pokharaha tola, Police Station- Bagen Gola, District Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Superintendent Of Police, Central Bureau Of Investigation, A.c.b., Dr. S.k. Singh Path, Bailey 2.

The General ManagerRegion , Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Bhawan, Exhibition Road, Patna-80 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Nivedita Nirveekar, Sr. Adv., Sc/CBI For FCI :

Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2023 Nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioner despite repeated calls.

2. However, Ld. APP for the State is present.

3. Perused the case record. It transpires that even on the last date, nobody was present on behalf of the Petitioner to attend the matter and the Petitioner was cautioned to attend the matter on the next date of hearing. Despite such cautioning, the Petitioner is not present to attend the matter, which shows that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53319 of 2015(4) dt.21-12-2023 2/2 the Petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present case.

3. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for default. (Jitendra Kumar, J) ramesh/- U T