Manoj Sao v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25959 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-644 Year-2021 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Manoj Sao Son of Badri Sao, R/o Mohalla- Chandpur Bela, Behind House of Annand Sir, Before Pakka Kunaha, Left Side Lane, P.S.- Jakkanpur, DistrictPatna, At Present Resident of Village- Kurthaoul, Adityanagar, P.S.- Parsabazar, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pranaya Shanker Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. Recovery is of total 12.750 liters of English wine. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that all together 12.750 liters of English wine has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. He further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25959 of 2022(2) dt.01-11-2022 2/3 submits that in fact the petitioner was not present and the wife of the petitioner was arrested on the spot. He further submits that there is no compliance of under Section 100 Cr.P.C. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Special Case No. 8488 of 2021 arising out of Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 644 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following conditions:-
1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
2. If the petitioner tampers with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25959 of 2022(2) dt.01-11-2022 3/3 evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T