Parmanand Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31996 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-625 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Parmanand Prasad S/o Late Deowatt Roy Resident of Village- Choti Sandalpur, Sharma Toli, P.S. Kasim Bazar, Distrct- Munger 2.
Shila Devi W/o Parmanand Prasad Resident of Village- Choti Sandalpur, Sharma Toli, P.S. Kasim Bazar, Distrct- Munger 3.
Chandramani Kumar Son of Parmanand Prasad Resident of Village- Choti Sandalpur, Sharma Toli, P.S. Kasim Bazar, Distrct- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Priyanka Kumari W/o Nagmani Kumar Resident of Village- Choti Sandalpur, Sharma Toli, P.S. Kasim Bazar, District- Munger. At present- C/o Sri Niranjan Singh Yadav, R/o Mohalla- Ghasiyari Tola, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 363, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The prosecution case is based upon an FIR lodged by the opposite party no. 2 in which she has made an allegation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31996 of 2024(10) dt.12-05-2025 2/3 of demand of dowry and torture. Petitioner are the father-inlaw, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of opposite party no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations levelled in the FIR are not correct and as a matter of fact, as per the fresh development, the husband and wife are staying together at the place of posting of the husband.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, however, submits that the wife is still not happy and she is still being threatened by the husband.
6. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are the in-laws and it is the husband who is primarily responsible for the welfare of the wife and the wife is as of now staying along with the husband whose case is still kept pending, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 625 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31996 of 2024(10) dt.12-05-2025 3/3 subject to the further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation/trial.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T