Ram Jinesh Sahni @ Ramjinish Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26473 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2021 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ram Jinesh Sahni @ Ramjinish Sahni Son Of Lute Sahni R/O VillageFakiradih, P.S.- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021 dated 05.06.2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 308, 354, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code has been added.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused blows Farsa on the head of informant, which caused injury and bleeding. His daughter was also assaulted by them while saving. It has also been alleged that accused persons snatched Mangalsutra of his wife. It has also alleged that the accused persons had looted Rs. 45450/- in cash and materials from his shop.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26473 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against the petitioner is Farsa blows on the head of the informant, but the injury report does not support the allegation. In the Injury report, the injury is caused by hard blunt substances. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2023 having no criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class (East), Muzaffarpur in Gaighat P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021.
(Khatim Reza, J) premchand/- U