Shalini Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.886 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Shalini Ranjan Wife of Rakesh Ranjan R/o Lalita Residency, Jalalpur Road, Sai Corporate, P.S.- Rupaspur, Dhanaut, District- Patna - 801506 2.

Rakesh Ranjan son of Dilip Kumar R/o Lalita Residency, Jalalpur Road, Sai Corporate, P.S.- Rupaspur, Dhanaut, Dist.- Patna-801506 ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary Government of Bihar 2.

Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar Patna 3.

The Director General of Police, Patna Bihar 4.

The Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Patna Bihar 5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna Bihar 6.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur Bihar 7.

Ranvijay Singh, Inspector cum SHO, Rupaspur Police Station Danapur, Bihar 8.

Naveen Kumar, Sub Inspector, Rupaspur Police Station Danapur ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :

G.P.-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the S.H.O. of Rupaspur Police Station, who is present in Court.

2.

The S.H.O. of Rupaspur Police Station has informed that pursuant to the order passed by the D.C.L.R. he has stopped the construction of the house of the petitioner though the petitioner is in possession of the land.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.886 of 2024(3) dt.27-06-2024 2/2 3.

The S.H.O. cannot stop the construction of any house or any property unless there is injunction order of any Court/ Authority.

4.

The S.H.O. of Rupaspur Police Station has submitted before this Court that he will not interfere in the possession and construction of the house of the petitioner in future unless there is an appropriate order of any Court/Authority.

5.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this criminal writ petition stands disposed of. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T