← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24823/2025bail rejected

Talib Nehal @ Talib Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24823 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2023 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Talib Nehal @ Talib Quraishi Son of Nehal Quraishi @ Nanhu Quraishi Resident of Quraishi Mohalla Kasav Tola PS- Aurangabad Town Nagar District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shakib Ayaz, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 307, 186, 353, 504, 506, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that as per instructions of higher authority, informant along with other government officials went to catch stray animals roaming on the road, in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner and some unknown persons attacked them by means of lathi and danda. Thus, all the accused persons assaulted government officials and caused hindrance in discharging their official duty.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24823 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to local politics. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of overt act against petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that this petitioner along with other accused persons assaulted informant and others while they were discharging their official duty and catching stray animals due to which two personnel sustained injury.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T