← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26448/2023bail granted

Ganeshi Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26448 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2022 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Ganeshi Mandal Son Of Late Kedar Mandal Resident Of Village - Bhawanipur, Godhiyari Tola, P.S. - Bhawanipur, Distt. - Purnea 2.

Mina Devi Wife Of Ganeshi Mandal Resident Of Village - Bhawanipur, Godhiyari Tola, P.S. - Bhawanipur, Distt. - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Ruby Kumari Wife Of Mithilesh Kumar Resident Of Village - Godhiyari Tola, P.S. - Bhawanipur, Distt. - Purnea, At Present Resident Of Village - Mohanpur, P.S. - Rupauli, Distt. - Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26448 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/3 petitioners. The petitioner No. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is father-in-law, of the victim. They have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. case No. 135 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioners do not co-operate during the trial, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26448 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 3/3 If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the Court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/Nitin U T