Satish Patel v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43369 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SARAN ====================================================== Satish Patel, Son of Late Basant Patel, Resident of Mohalla- Old Gudri, Sahebganj, P.S.- Chapra Nagar, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Ginee Devi, W/o Satish Patel, Muhalla- Purani Gurhatti Saheb Ganj, P.S.- Nagar, Distt- Saran.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 55/2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498(A)/34 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the informant due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43369 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 petitioner. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the State that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 55/2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T