Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Prasad v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40983 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40983 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -545 Year- 2016 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Prasad Son of Sri Shiv Sahni Mahto, R/o Village- Amthua, P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Priyanka Kumari W/o Ravindra Prasad @ Ravindra Kumar, R/o VillageAmthua , P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad Presently Resident of Village & P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 498(A), 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40983 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Complaint case No.545 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T