Preetam Kumar Singh @ Pritam Kumar Singh @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24061 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Preetam Kumar Singh @ Pritam Kumar Singh @ Golu, aged about 30 years (M), Son of Ram Bharosh Singh, Resident of Village - Lodhwe, P.S.- Fatehpur, Distt - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandeep Shahi, Advocate Mr.Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma For the State :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore, A.P.P.

For the Informant : Mr. Zainul Abedin, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 03 of 2019 registered under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he is not named in the F.I.R. In her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the informant has not named the petitioner. Some persons have committed rape with her but injury report shows

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24061 of 2019(3) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 that there is no any internal injury.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 03 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :

(1) On of the bailors would be close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable properties, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner will appear before the learned Court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

(3) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T