Dr.Sachchidanand Patel v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.11488 of 2011 (5) dt.02-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11488 of 2011 ====================================================== Dr.Sachchidanand Patel, son of Sri Yadunandan Rama, Resident of Mohalla Loharpatti, Main Road Geyan Babu Chawk, P.S. Motihari Town, DistrictEast Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Governing Body of Karpoori Thakur Inter College, Motihari, District- East Champaran, through its Secretary.
3. Sri Ajay Kumar, the Secretary of Governing Body of Karpoori Thakur Inter College, Motihari, District- East Champaran.
4. The Bihar School Examination (Higher Secondary) Board, Patna through its Secretary.
5. The Karpoori Thakur Inter College, Motihari through its Principal.
6. The Principal of the Karpoori Thakur College, Motihari, District East Champaran.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : None For the State : Md. Naseem Mukhtar, AC to AAG-12 For Respondent No.2 & 3 : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate For Bihar School Examination Board : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 On the last date also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. When the matter is called out, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 4 is present.
It has been submitted on behalf of counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board that the remedy of the petitioner lies before the District Appellant Authority as per the Bihar State School Teachers and Employees Disputes Redressal Rules, 2015, the present writ application is not maintainable.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11488 of 2011 (5) dt.02-08-2017 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner, if so advised, may prefer an application as per the provisions under the Rules i.e. 15(2) before the District Appellate Authority, Motihari within 30 days.
(Sudhir Singh, J) veena/- U T