Angad Choubey And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23285 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2004 Thana -RAMGARH District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Angad Choubey, Son of Late Shiu Narayan Choubey,

2. Rajiv Choubey @ Raju Choubey, Son of Angad Choubey, Both are resident of Village- Vidaman Chowk, P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S.Case No. 07 of 2004 registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is of causing death of mother of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that except suspicion there is nothing against them and police after investigation submitted final form in the year 2009 but after eight years the Magistrate differing with the final form has taken cognizance against the petitioners and others in this case. Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23285 of 2018 (2) dt.19-04-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order and on their so surrendering they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Ramgarh P.S.Case No. 07 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and petitioners will co-operate in investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, except on genuine reason, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U