Triloki Chaupal @ Trilok Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24735 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2020 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== Triloki Chaupal @ Trilok Chaupal S/o Anup Chaupal R/o Village- Raiyam, P.S.- Bhairawasthan, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Radha Devi W/o Pradeep Paswan R/o Village- Raiyam, P.S.- Bhairavasthan, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354(B), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, on 15.11.2020 at 6:30 PM, the informant had gone to attend the call of nature, in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner surrounded her and tried to commit rape on her and when elder brother-in-law and Gotini of informant came to save her, they were assaulted by other co-accused by means of iron rod and Farsa.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present case is counter blast of Bhairavasthan P.S. Case No. 167
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24735 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 of 2020, which was lodged by co-accused Parmeshwar Chaupal against informant and other family members. As a matter of fact, on a petty dispute, simple Maarpeet took place in which both sides sustained injury. Two similarly situated co-accused namely Lalit Chaupal and Suraj Mukhiya have been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 18.10.2024 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 48894 of 2024. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 3rd, Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani in connection with Bhairavasthan P.S. Case No. 165 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T