← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/898/2014dismissed

Dr. Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-05Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.898 of 2014 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16772 of 2012 ====================================================== Dr. Ashok Kumar aged about 64 years S/o Late Gajendra Prasad Sharma Resident of Mohalla S.K. Puri, Opposite Mithila Motors (NH 28) Bhagwanpur Chowk, Muzaffarpur, Police Station Sadar, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Joint Secretary, Human Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Bihar Agriculture University at Sabour, Bhagalpur through its Registrar, having office at Sabour, Bhagalpur.

6. The Vice Chancellor, Bihar Agricultural University, at Sabour, Bhagalpur having office at Sabour, Bhagalpur.

7. The Associate Dean cum Principal, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour.

8. Ram Sanehi Chaudhary aged about 67 years S/o Late Uma Kant Chaudhary Resident of Bihar Agriculture University Campus, P.S. and P.O. Sabour, District Bhagalpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate.

For the University : Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)

Patna High Court LPA No.898 of 2014 (3) dt.05-10-2016 2/2 05-10-2016 Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of the order passed in L.P.A. No. 1210 of 2013 on 15.05.2015, the present Letters Patent Appeal is rendered infructuous.

The Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

(Hemant Gupta, J) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar/Anjani U