← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26849/2023bail granted

Parmanand Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-16Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 26849 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2023 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

PARMANAND RAM SON OF SHAMBHU RAM R/O VILLAGEMIRJAPUR, P.S.- SHAHPUR PATORI, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR 2.

JAYPRAKASH RAY SON OF LATE AMARNATH RAY R/O VILLAGEMIRJAPUR, P.S.- SHAHPUR PATORI, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 69.120 liters of liquor from the house of the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession, it is next submitted that even the alleged house is a joint family property,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 26849 of 2023(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 as such, it cannot be alleged with certainty that it were the petitioners who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within their knowledge, it is also submitted that the name of the petitioners transpired based on confessional statement of co-accused in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value, when admittedly petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Patori P.S. Case No. 138 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T