Arvind Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25750 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Arvind Dubey S/o Ramayan Dubey R/o Village- Dhanauti, P.S.- Vijaipur, Distt.- Gopalganj 2.

Amit Dubey@ Trinali S/o Arvind Dubey R/o Village- Dhanauti, P.S.- Vijaipur, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025 dated 11.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons holding farsa and gadasa are alleged to have come to the door of the informant and started assaulting the informant's son, Aditya Dubey and his nephew Shivam Dubey with intention to kill causing head injuries. Thereafter, the accused persons fled away from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25750 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is a land dispute between the parties. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged offence. As per the impugned order, the injuries are stated to be simple in nature. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 12.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gopalganj in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T