Yugal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.16589 of 2014 dt.26-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16589 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Yugal Kishore Singh Son of Shri Nanhak Singh Resident of Village - Sowal, P.O. Tekari, P.S. Tekari, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya

3. The Sub - Divisional Officer, Tekari

4. The Block Supply officer - Cum - Marketing Officer, Guraru, District - Gaya

5. The District Supply Officer - Cum - Marketing Officer, Gaya .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rashid Izhar,Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC17-ARBIND KUMAR NO. II =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo no. 87/M dated 04.06.2012 passed by the SubDivisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya by which the licence of the petitioner's Fair Price shop bearing no. 12/1990 has been cancelled and monthly allotment has been stopped; and further to restore the petitioner's licence.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a short submission to assail the impugned order on the ground that a copy of the enquiry report was not made available to the petitioner and he was never confronted with the same with an opportunity of being heard or adducing evidence in that regard. A specific stand has been taken in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit that the impugned order of cancellation of licence has been passed without providing a copy of the enquiry report to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16589 of 2014 dt.26-07-2018 petitioner, though the same had been relied upon in the impugned order. Such infirmity could not be cured in the appeal as well.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has been heard.

5. In the above view of the matter, this Court is satisfied that non-supply of the enquiry report to the petitioner has resulted in violation of natural justice and thus the decision making process stands vitiated. The impugned order dated 04.06..2012 (Annexure-6) is hereby quashed and the matter remanded to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya for taking decision afresh in the matter after supplying a copy of the enquiry report to the petitioner and granting an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law. Licence of the petitioner shall be restored without delay until fresh orders are passed by the respondent no. 3.

6. It is made clear that in case the stand of the petitioner denying receipt of the enquiry report prior to order of cancellation being passed is found to be incorrect, the respondents shall be at liberty to approach this Court for recall of this judgment.

7. The writ petition stands allowed as above. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 31.07.2018 Transmission Date NA