Manish Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24827 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- SIMRI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Manish Sahni S/O Chitranjan Sahni R/O Village- Gauda Bujurg, Gauda, Ullu Tola, Ward No 02, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kanchan Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent-State as well as the counsel appearing for the informant.
2. It is the first regular bail application submitted by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 dated 13.02.2025 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 303 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to the case of prosecution, it is alleged that on 12.02.2025 at about 04:30 P.M one motorcycle bearing no. BR 07 AV 5883 of the victim/complainant Pappu Yadav has been stolen by some unknown person. Subsequently, on 15.02.2025 the said stolen motorcycle was seized from field of the village of the petitioner, on this ground he has been arrested on 15.02.2025 and since then he is in custody.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24827 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and is falsely implicated in this case, there is no legal evidence available against him on the basis of which it can be said that he is involved in the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioner has no any previous criminal antecedent. Therefore, it is prayed by him that the petitioner may be granted benefit of bail.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondentState opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
6. Considering the submission made by the counsels and further considering the fact that in the FIR name of the petitioner/applicant has not been mentioned and recovery is also not made from him. Thus, the application preferred by the petitioner is allowed, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties to the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga.
(Arvind Singh Chandel , J) Siddharth Soni/- U T