Parmeshwar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26646 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2021 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

PARMESHWAR PANDIT SON OF YUGAL PANDIT R/O- VILLAGEPUPRI, P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 2.

SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF PARMESHWAR PANDIT R/O- VILLAGEPUPRI, P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 3.

SURAJ PANDIT SON OF PARMESHWAR PANDIT R/O- VILLAGEPUPRI, P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case no. 58 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the DP Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners have tortured in various ways to the informant due to non-fulfillment dowry demand and ultimately they ousted her after snatching her belongings.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioner no. 1 and 2 are parents-in-law and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26646 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 petitioner no. 3 is brother-in-law of the informant and have been falsely implicated in this case. They have never demanded any thing from the informant. They have no concern with the daily activity of the informant and her husband. They are living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband of the informant and not against his family members. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case no. 58 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pupri at Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U