← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51203/2016rejected

Ranjeet Mehta v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-06-19Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51203 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -990 Year- 2015 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Mehta, son of Sita Ram Mehta, resident of Village- Bhagwanpur Panchayat Majhuwa East, Police Station- Bousi- Basethi, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ruby Devi, Daughter of Maheswari Mehta, resident of Village- Belasara, Police Station- Raniganj, District- Araria.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 990 C of 2015 registered under Sections498A and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity but the complainant does not want to live with this petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is the husband and is adamant not to keep the complainant. Matter was sent to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51203 of 2016 (5) dt.19-06-2017 2/2 Mediation Centre for settlement, however the same failed. There are allegations of cruelty and harassment due to nonfulfillment of demand against this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission advanced on behalf of the parties, I do not feel inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is, therefore, rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Manish/- U T