← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19432/2013withdrawn

Butan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-12-19Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19432 of 2013 ====================================================== Butan Thakur, Son of Malitar Thakur, Resident of Village Bela, Post Office + Police Station- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Collector Aurangabad, Bihar 2.

The Collector, Aurangabad, Bihar 3.

The District Establishment Deputy Collector, Aurangabad 4.

The Chief Engineer (Mechanical) South Bihar Public Health Engineer Department, Government Of Bihar 5.

The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division No.Ii, Bihar-Sharif, District- Nalanda 6.

The Superintending Engineer, National Highway Works Circle, Patna 7.

The Executive Engineer, Road Division No. Ii, Aurangabad 8.

The Superintending Engineer, Magadh Road Circle, Gaya 9.

The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Magadh Circle, Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Chandana, Advocate Mr. Amarendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-12-2025

1. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs :- "That this application is preferred for issuance of an appropriate writ preferably in the nature of 'Mandamus' commanding upon the respondent authorities to considered the case of the petitioner for regularization of his services on the post of Road Roller Driver under the Government of Bihar with all consequential

Patna High Court CWJC No.19432 of 2013(6) dt.19-12-2025 2/2 benefits.

It is also for grant of any other reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

3. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U