Patna High CourtMJC/5047/2013dismissed

Mahesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-24Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5047 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 656 of 2008 =========================================================== Mahesh Prasad S/O Late Ramdhani Prasad Resident Of Village Mirganj, P.S. Warisaliganj, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amarjeet Sinha S/O Name Not Known To The Petitioner At Present Working As The Secretary, Department Of Primary, Secondary And Adult Education, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. Shri Ajay Kumar Choudhary S/O Name Not Known To The Petitioner At Present Working As The Director (Education), Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Medo Das S/O Name Not Known To The Petitioner At Present Working As The Regional Deputy Director Of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya.

4. Sri Binod Kumar Jha S/O Name Not Known To The Petitioner At Present Working As The District Programme Officer, Gaya, Bihar.

5. Sri Binod Kumar Jha S/O Name Not Known To The Petitioner At Present Working As Sub Divisional Education Officer, Gaya, Bihar.

6. Sri Hare Krishna Jha S/O Name Not Known To The Petitioner At Present Working As Block Education Extension Officer, Atri, Gaya (Bihar). .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. KRIPA NAND JHA, ADVOCATE For the State : Mr. S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP 17 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-08-2016 Heard the parties.

Final decision has been taken by the authority concerned granting retiral benefit to the petitioner but not granting him the salary for the alleged period of absence.

In my view, such decision having been taken by the authority concerned after compliance of the order passed by this Court, the

Patna High Court MJC No.5047 of 2013 dt.24-08-2016 present proceeding cannot continue.

However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the part of the order by which the salary has not been paid to him and, if so advised, he may assail the same before the competent forum. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13-09-2016 Transmission Date NA