Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26168/2026bail granted

Md. Monaf @ Munaf v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26168 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Monaf @ Munaf S/O Abdul Ahad @ Abdul Ahmad R/O Vill- Lahan Dhaka, P.S- Dhaka, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Zaki Haider For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(4), 324(4), 326(g), 115(2), 109, 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedents of two cases.

4. Prosecution story in short is that the accused persons including the petitioner was enraged when the deceased was brought to the hospital and was declared dead by the doctor, accordingly, the accused persons including the petitioner created ruckus and set ambulance on fire and the accused were identified by video footage.

5. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26168 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 further submitted that petitioner has no relation or concern with the deceased and they had gone to the hospital on the date of occurrence in connection of treatment of his relative where he also got captured in the video footage. It is also submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Md. Naushad Alam has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide an order dated 24.3.2026 in Cr. Misc. No. 17483 of 2026.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhaka PS case No. 302 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C./ u/s 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T