Sanjay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25281 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Sanjay Sahani S/o Nagendra Sahani Resident of village - Panditpur, Malahi Tola, P.S.- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran 2.

Sona Devi W/o Sanjay Sahani Resident of village - Panditpur, Malahi Tola, P.S.- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran 3.

Vinod Sahani S/o Nagendra Sahani Resident of village - Panditpur, Malahi Tola, P.S.- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 223, 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 132, 109, 352, 351(3) of the BNS and Section 45 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 and 2 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.3 has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and petitioner no.2 is a woman and allegation is that a mob created ruckus when police force reached the house of Nagendra Sahni and damaged the government vehicle and even assaulted the force leading to injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25281 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026 2/2

4. It is next submitted that petitioners were not arrested from the spot. It is also submitted that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that petitioners came to be implicated being sons and daughter-in-law of Nagendra Sahni. It is also submitted that petitioners have been implicated only with a view to coerce Nagendra Sahni into submission with general and omnibus allegation.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No.370/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T