Abhinandan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1076 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18852 of 2021 ====================================================== Abhinandan Chaudhary Son of Late Ramkhelawan Chaudhary, resident of Village - Sisauni Kothi P.S. - Dandari, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner.
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary State of Bihar, Patna namely Amir Subhani.
2.
The District Magistrate, Begusarai namely Raushan Kushwaha. 3.
The District Supply Officer, Begusarai namely Som Nath Singh. 4.
The Sub Divisional Officer (S.D.O.) Balia, Begusarai namely Rohit Kumar. 5.
The Block Supply Officer, Dandari, District - Begusarai namely Sangita Kumari.
6.
The Block Development Officer, Dandari, District - Begusarai namely Priyanka Bharti.
7.
The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Utari Katarmala, Block - Dandari, District - Begusarai namely Inderdeo Rai @ Indal. 8.
The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Utari Katarmala, Block - Dandari, District - Begusarai namely Rajendra Das. 9.
Rakesh Chaudhary Son of Late Shri Narayan Chaudhary, resident of Village - Sisauni Kothi, P.S. - Dandari, District - Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. Arvind Ujjwal (SC-4).
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 06-08-2024 Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that orders of this Court has been complied. Therefore, nothing remains in the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the
Patna High Court MJC No.1076 of 2023(4) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 petitioner disputed certain issues. The same cannot be adjudicated in the present lis.
3. Accordingly, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the action of the respondents, in accordance with law. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) P.S./- U