Lakshman Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10111 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2015 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ======================================================
1. Lakshman Rai, S/o Yuge Rai,
2. Rita Devi W/o Lakshaman Rai, both R/o Village- Moglaha, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SRI HUMAYOU AHMAD KHAN ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Babubarhi P.S. case no. 182 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Babubarhi P.S. case no. 182 of 2015, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10111 of 2018(2) dt.22-02-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM II, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T