Nityanand Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1077 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13515 of 2021 ====================================================== Nityanand Sharma Son of Sharda Singh, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Richie Pandey, son of not known to the petitioner, District Magistrate, District-Jehanabad. 2.

Sri Manoj Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Sub-Divisional Officer, District-Jehanabad.

3.

Sri Rakesh Ranjan, son of not known to the petitioner, Circle Officer, District-Jehanabad.

4.

Sri Yugal Kishore Bharti, son of not known to the petitioner, Circle Officer, District-Jehanabad.

5.

Krishna Mohan Das, son of Late Karu Das, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

6.

Jagdeo Das, Son of Krit Das, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

7.

Balkeshwar Das, Son of Vishwambhar Das, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

8.

Raju Das, son of Balkeshwar Das, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

9.

Raju Das, son of Balkeshwar Da, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

10.

Shyamdeo Das, son of Gangu Das, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

11.

Pawan Sharma, son of Shyam Bihari Singh, Resident of Village-Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vardaan Mangalam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 The learned senior counsel for the opposite parties submits that now all the encroachments in question have been

Patna High Court MJC No.1077 of 2023(11) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 removed, however it is the complain of the learned counsel for the petitioner that some encroachment is still subsisting, hence the petitioner be granted liberty to approach the District Magistrate, Jehanabad for redressal of his subsisting grievances.

2. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3. Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) GAURAV S./- U