Bhola Mahra @ Bhola v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24985 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2023 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Bhola Mahra @ Bhola S/O Bilat Mahra Resident of Village- Piprahi, P.SLadaniya, District- Madhubani. 2.

Mukesh Kumar Ram @ Mukesh Ram S/O Vijay Ram Resident of VillagePiprahi, P.S- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. 3.

Ram Kumari @ Ram Kumari Devi W/O Vijay Ram Resident of VillagePiprahi, P.S- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. 4.

Arhul Devi @ Aruniya Devi W/O Lakhan Ram Resident of Village- Piprahi, P.S- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.

5.

Jyoti Devi @ Jyoti Kumari W/O Anil Ram Resident of Village- Piprahi, P.SLadaniya, District- Madhubani. 6.

Sumitra Devi @ Samundari Devi W/O Ranjeet Ram Resident of VillagePiprahi, P.S- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. 7.

Nirmala Devi D/O Bhola Ram Resident of Village- Piprahi, P.S- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.

8.

Pulkit Ram S/O Munni Mahra Resident of Village- Piprahi, P.S- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 141, 341, 323, 427, 354(B), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant and her sister by lathi and bricks resulting in injuries to them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24985 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that out of total eight petitioners five are female members of the family and a dispute had arisen on account of throwing out the pillar (Khuta) due to which some act of hurling abuses and assault took place. The bail rejection order itself indicates that the injuries received by the injured persons were simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance, as such, section levelled is Section 323 of the IPC. It is further submitted that no offence under Section 354 of the IPC which is the only non-bailable section, is made out against any of the petitioners. Further, the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the general and omnibus nature of allegations and simple nature of injuries, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ladaniya

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24985 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026 3/3 P.S. Case No. 197 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T