← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18803/2015disposed

Laxmi Construction And Electricals Works v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-15Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18803 of 2015 =========================================================== Laxmi Construction & Electricals Works through its authorized signatory namely Chandradeep Singh son of Late Girdhari Singh, having office at Ward No. 20, House No. 395, Laxmipur, Siwan Road, P.S.- Siwan Sadar, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Nagar Parishad, Dehri through Executive Officer, having Office at Dehri, Dalmia Nagar, Distt.- Sasaram (Rohtas)

3. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Dehri, Dalmia Nagar, Distt.- Sasaram (Rohtas) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC1- M.K. SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the Respondent No. 3 to comply with the requirements in terms of the Agreement, to provide the list of places where the petitioner firm was required to install the LED lights in terms of Tender Notice No. 01 of 2014-15 and consequent work orders issued in favour of the petitioner by order dated 25.10.2014 and 22.04.2015, and for connected reliefs.

3. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Patna High Court CWJC No.18803 of 2015 dt.15-12-2015 however, confines the relief sought, seeking only a direction to the Respondent No. 3 to dispose of his representation dated 08.08.2015 and to provide the required details in connection with erection and installation of LED lights as per Agreement.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has been heard.

5. In the above view of the matter and with consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Executive Engineer, Nagar Parishad, Dehri, Dalmia Nagar, Sasaram, District Rohtas (Respondent no. 3) with a fresh representation for redressal of his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. If such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of on its own merits in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within six weeks from the date of the representation being filed.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U