Sunil Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36811 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -MURLIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Sunil Sharma, son of Gajendra Sharma, R/o Village- Dumariya, P.S.- Murliganj, District- Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chaubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 02-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Murliganj P.S. Case No.13 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant, Ranjeet Sharma, with Dabiya on his head. Injury Report of the informant is available in the case diary, wherein, doctor has found injury on the person of the informant, which is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.

It has been submitted that there is land dispute between the parties.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36811 of 2017 (4) dt.02-01-2018 2/2 the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No.13 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T