← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6464/2024dismissed

Doon Public School v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6464 of 2024 ====================================================== Doon Public School Ramzanpur, Begusarai an Affiliated School from CBSE, New Delhi through its Chairman Pankaj Kumar, Male, Aged About- 51 Years, Son of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- SihmaDih, SihmaBarari, Ward No. 2, Police Station- Matihani, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Bihar State Information Commission through its Information Commissioner, Information Bhawan, New Secretariate, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

5.

Mr. Somesh Bahadur Mathur The Deputy Development Commissioner, Begusarai.

6.

Mrs. Sharmila Ray The District Education Officer, Begusarai. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rohit Raj, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs and order/orders in the nature of mandamus for directing and commanding the respondents to provide the information sought by the Petitioner through Right to Information on 10/01/2024 (ANNEXURE 6) because the petitioner is aggrieved by non-responsive behavior of the Respondent No 5 in connivance with the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6464 of 2024(2) dt.01-07-2024 2/2 Respondent No 4 & 6.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs and order/orders in the nature of mandamus for directing and commanding the Respondent No 1 and 2 to take strict actions against the Respondent No 4, 5 and 6 and for enquiry from specialized agency."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of its aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U