← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31018/2024bail granted

Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-25Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31018 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2022 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Munna Kumar, Male aged about 19 years, Son of Chhote Lal Rai, Resident of Village- Sundarapur Malahi Tola, P.S.- Kesariya, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 424 of 2022 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, one loaded katta with 0.315 bore live cartridge has been recovered from the possession of the petitiner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He next submits that the petitioner is accused in two other cases. Petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2022.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. From perusal of the FIR and the impugned order of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31018 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 2/2 the learned Additional Sessions Judge-19, East Champaran, Motihari dated 21.02.2024, it appears that one loaded katta has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, there is no any independent witness of the seizure list and the period of custody, accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 424 of 2022.

7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 (fifteen days) from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be released on bail on above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.

U T