Chamru Sah @ Chamru Shaw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26615 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2021 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

CHAMRU SAH @ CHAMRU SHAW S/o- Judagi Sah Resident of At Village - Birpur, P.S. - Jurawanpur, Dist.- Vaishali. 2.

Sarita Devi @ Sabita Devi W/o- Chamru Sah Resident of At Village - Birpur, P.S. - Jurawanpur, Dist.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application against petitioner no. 1. Permission is accorded.

This application is dismissed as withdrawn only against petitioner no. 1.

So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, the instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case no. 71 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner had tortured in various ways to the daughter of the informant due to non-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26615 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 2/3 fulfillment dowry demand and ultimately they killed her and with a view to wipe out the evidence, they silently disappeared her body.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in this case. She has never demanded any thing from the deceased. She has no concern with the daily activity of the deceased and her husband. She was living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband and not upon his family members. Husband is languishing in judicial custody.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. The petitioner no. 2 is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Jurabanpur P.S. Case no. 71 of 2021, she will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26615 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 3/3 Magistrate, 1st Class, Hajipur, Vaishali subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U