← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17953/2010disposed

Ram Das Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17953 of 2010 ====================================================== Ram Das Pandey S/O Late Kesho Pandey R/O Vill & P.O.Chhatanwar, P.S. Krishna Brahan(Dumraon), Distt-Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department (Water Resources Department) Government Of Bihar, Secretariate, Patna

3. The Awar Sachiv, Minor Irrigation Department (Water Resources Department) Govt. Of Bihar, Patna, Secretariate, Patna

4. The Chief Engineer, South Tube Well Panbhall Minor Irrigation Department Sheikhpura, Patna

5. The Superintending Engineer, Tube Well Circle Bhojpur At Arrah

6. The Executive Engineer, Tube Well Pramandal Buxar

7. The Accountant General Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc11) For A.G. : Mr. Raghwanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2018 The present petition has been filed for directing the respondents to pay the differential amount of salary on account of grant of benefits of first and second A.C.P. to the petitioner by the respondents vide letter dated 07.05.2007. The petitioner has further prayed for grant of difference of salary in accordance with the re-fixation of pay done by the respondents vide letter dated 25.07.2005.

In view of the nature of the prayer made by the petitioner, this Court deems it fit and appropriate to dispose of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.17953 of 2010 (2) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 present writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to ensure payment of the differential arrears of salary, if not already paid, within a period of four weeks, failing which, penal consequences shall fall on the respondent no.4. Since no body appears for the respondent no. 4, the Registry is directed to communicate a copy of the present order to the respondent no. 4 for compliance. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U