Ajay Ram @ Ajay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28533 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajay Ram @ Ajay Rai S/o- Shambhu Sharan Ram @ Shambhu Sharan Village- Rajpur Ps- Kesariya Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Dy. S.P Vigilance Investigation, Bureau, Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dhannjay Kumar II, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP For the Vigilance :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Mr. Paritosh Parimal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have obtained appointment on the post of "Panchayat Teacher" on the basis of forged and fabricated certificate.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28533 of 2025(4) dt.28-07-2025 2/3 committed no offence. Petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Teacher after investigation of all his certificates by the concerned department, but later on, same have been declared as forged and fabricated without proper verification or giving any notice to the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner has already resigned from his service vide letter dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure-P/2 to this petition). Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Vigilance have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation, the fact that petitioner has already resigned from his services and clean antecedents, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 323 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28533 of 2025(4) dt.28-07-2025 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T