Mahendra Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17995 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Mahendra Kumar, Son of Sri Gopal Prasad, resident of MohallaManpur, Surya Pokhar Road, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

2. Santosh Yadav, son of Sri Ashok Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Manpur Bazar, Yadav Toli, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

3. Tena Malakar, son of Late Gaya Malakar, resident of Mohalla- Manpur Bazar, Gopalganj Road, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

4. Indradeo Vidrohi, son of Sri Ramesharan Mahto, resident of MohallaManpur, Khanjahanpur, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

5. Deepak Kumar, son of Kali Sao, resident of Mohalla- Manpur Bazar, Gopalganj Road, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

6. Shakti Kumar, son of Rameshwar Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Manpur Bazar, Day House, Police Station- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

3. The District Magistrate, Gaya.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya.

5. The Circle Officer, Manpur, Gaya.

6. The Block Development Officer, Manpur, Gaya.

7. The Officer-in-Charge, Muffasil Police Station, Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A. K. Chaudhary, A.A.G. No.13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 30-01-2016 Heard Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioners, and Mr. A. K. Chauhdary, learned Additional Advocate General No.13, appearing for the respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioners, seeks permission

Patna High Court CWJC No.17995 of 2015 (2) dt.30-01-2016 2/2 to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioners. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Sunil/- U