← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30186/2024bail granted

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Bubu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-10Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30186 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2023 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ram Kumar Yadav @ Bubu Yadav SON OF Late Jageshwar Yadav RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARSA BISHANPUR POLICE STATIONKEOTI DISTRICT -DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The State Of Bihar THE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF BIHAR 3.

The State Of Bihar THE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to land on account of which, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other and the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by farsa causing injury on head, but then it is submitted that the blow was not repeated and petitioner is not a criminal and is in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30186 of 2024(3) dt.10-05-2024 2/2 custody since 27.02.2024. It is next submitted that the petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the trial.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 99 of 2023.

6. However, if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release, is trying to delay the trial, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds forthwith.

7. Accordingly, the instant application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T