Ramesh Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3924 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -173 Year- 2017 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ramesh Singh, Son of Late Shiv Mangal Singh

2. Sabita Devi, Wife of Ramesh Singh

3. Rajnish Kumar.

4. Manish Kumar, Both sons of Ramesh Singh, All resident of Village- Kudiya, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran, Motihari.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Pipra P.S. Case No. 173 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is general and omnibus allegation against petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4. Allegation against petitioner No. 1 is of assaulting the husband of the informant with Farsa on his head. The injury report has been enclosed as Annexure-2 series wherein the injury on the person of the husband of the informant namely,Nag Narain Singh has been found to be simple

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3924 of 2018 (2) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 in nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 173 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T