← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3329/2011dfd for non appearance

Rohit Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-04Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3329 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Rohit Kumar Late Dashrath Prasad Singh Village Ramdiri Tola Ram Nagar, P.S. Matihani, Posted At Gram Kutchery Dumri Under Block Begusarai, Dist. Begusarai.

2. Tara Singha D/O Ram Chandra Singh Village & P.O. Ramdiri (Nakti), P.S. Matihani, Posted At Gram Kutchery, Kaithma Under Block Begusarai, Dist. Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Dist. Begusarai.

5. The Block Development Officer, Begusarai Block, Dist. Begusarai.

6. The Sarpanch Of Gram Kutchery, Dumari Under Block Begusarai, Dist. Begusarai.

7. The Up Sarpanch Gram Kutchery, Dumari Under Block Begusarai, Dist. Begusarai.

8. The Sarpanch Of Gram Kutchery Kaithwa Under Block Begusarai, Dist. Begusarai.

9. The Up Sarpanch Of Gram Kutchery Kaithwa Under Block Begusarai, Dist. Begusarai.

10. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Begusarai. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Girija Shankar Pd Gp1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 5.

04-01-2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application once again.

Perusal of the order-sheets of the case would show that earlier also when no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners on two consecutive dates the writ application was dismissed in default on 02.11.2015. Later on it was restored vide order dated 13.09.2017 passed in

Patna High Court CWJC No.3329 of 2011 (5) dt.04-01-2018 MJC No. 2358/2016.

Today, once again no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application which gives an impression that petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter.

This application is dismissed for nonprosecution. Rajeev/- (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) U