Lalan Chandravanshi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35168 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -380 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Lalan Chandravanshi S/o Late Yugeshwar Chandravanshi
2. Sunita Devi W/o of Lalan Chandravansi Both are resident of village-Beda Nahar, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP-109. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P. S. Case No. 380 of 2016 registered under Sections 307, 323, 354, 341, 448 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Accusation is that both the petitioners along with their son Dharmendra Prajapati all of a sudden entered into the house of the informant and started abusing and on protest by the informant, she was pulled down on the ground and assaulted with fists and slap and in the mean time, petitioner no. 1 assaulted on her head by rod due to which she got injured. When Sabita Devi, wife of Rajendra Chandravanshi came to rescue her, she was also pulled down on the ground and snatched her ornament. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35168 of 2016 (2) dt.02-09-2016 2/2 reason behind this incident is that Dharmendra Prajapati, son of the petitioners used to call the daughter of the informant on the mobile phone and often used to misbehave with her. For that, protest was made by the informant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the quarrel is between the children of both the families. Due to which, this present case has been lodged. Only two injuries were found on the person of the informant caused by hard and blunt substance. The injuries were found to be simple in nature.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) Case No. 380 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Sections 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Mishra/- U T