Mantu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3805 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -350 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Mantu Yadav S/o Late Ramdeo Yadav, R/o Village- Maniara, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 350 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of ten litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery was made from an abandoned room, which will appear from the seizure list itself. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3805 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 2/2 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Excise), Gaya, in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 350 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C as well as subject to the following conditions.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T